Signup Sample Report


Signup for a free 7 Day account and view Marcellus, Utica, Eagle Ford, and Antrim shale map layers in Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia, Texas, and Michigan. Subscribe to view recent Lease Offers and Available Property, and additional pipeline layers. Click the Free Signup to get started, no software downloads required! (Firefox is recommended Browser)

Recent Maps


EQT Wetzel Co WV Permit Location 02-2016


Chesapeake Jefferson Co OH 12 2015 Permit.Pipeline


Gulfport Belmont Permit Location 11-24-2015


11-2015 Gulfport Belmont Co Permit


XTO Belmont Co Permit Loc w/Pipelines

Finding high-graded acreage without a drilled horizontal well

Finding high-graded acreage where no horizontal well has yet been drilled starts with separating geological promise from commercial readiness. A blank-looking parcel can sit over attractive shale, yet fail because its leases do not control a contiguous drilling window, the mineral estate is fragmented, or no realistic path exists to pipelines and production facilities. Genuine opportunity is not simply virgin ground; it is acreage an operator can develop profitably and repeat.

Shale Navigator brings shale plays, drilling permits, lease offers, pipelines, mineral rights and property records into one map. That makes it possible to move from regional geology to a defensible shortlist without treating every mapped gap as an opportunity. For Australian investors, land professionals and energy advisers evaluating U.S. shale, the key is to combine subsurface fit with lease control, infrastructure and U.S. title law before assigning value.

Read the shale play before searching parcels

A shale play is not one undifferentiated target. Operators usually work a particular formation and depth interval, then rank variations in thickness, total organic carbon, pressure, brittleness and fracability. A property outside the current landing window may remain prospective, but it should not be presented as high-graded simply because it has no horizontal production nearby.

Begin with one basin, one named formation and a realistic depth band. Compare public geological data with Shale Navigator’s play, permit, lease-offer, pipeline, mineral-rights and property layers. This removes broad areas that cannot support the chosen development concept and keeps the search tied to rock that an operator would actually consider drilling.

Lease offers and drilling permits reveal where industry attention is moving, but neither proves development economics. Check nearby vertical wells, recent horizontal locations, proposed parent-child offsets and available service markets. A blank area next to several productive wells can be a stronger prospect than a large untouched block beyond gathering capacity.

Distinguish white space from excluded ground

The absence of a horizontal well can mean several things. It can signal an emerging play, an appraisal gap, a parcel just outside a lease boundary or a location deferred until infrastructure catches up. It can also reveal a geological disappointment, fractured title, an expired option or a lease burdened by old plugging and environmental costs.

High-grade geological white space needs evidence from both sides. Studies should show that the target interval is continuous and capable of commercial production, while offset data should support repeatable well spacing. Surface and subsurface maps must also show a credible route from the drilling pad to a gathering line, processing plant or other takeaway arrangement.

Do not mistake a proposed permit for a completed well. Review the application status, directional profile and anticipated landing window, then compare it with legacy vertical wells and nearby horizontal wells. If operators have repeatedly passed over an undrilled acreage block without drilling, establish why before treating the gap as an invitation.

Apply a two-stage acreage screen

The first stage belongs on the map and should be quick enough to compare many candidates consistently.

  • Fix the basin, formation and depth window before reviewing individual parcels.
  • Remove areas with producing horizontal wells, recent parent-child interference or inadequate recoverable rock.
  • Retain only contiguous blocks supported by the relevant lease and mineral rights.
  • Overlay pipelines, roads, processing facilities, water sources and prospective tie-ins.
  • Flag active permits, lease offers, option deadlines and recent operator activity.

The second stage tests whether a map candidate can become a drillable and financeable project. Keep a written reason for every inclusion or rejection: operators revisit prospects when lease terms, commodity prices or rig counts change, so the guidance on organise prospect bookmarks can turn scattered candidates into a working library of prospective leases.

  • Confirm the block can support a commercial well count at the operator’s planned spacing.
  • Check rig and frac availability, gathering capacity and an executable route to takeaway.
  • Test lease expiry, drilling commitments, royalties, burdens and surface-access terms.
  • Price a realistic well cost, including gathering, water handling and plugging exposure.
  • Rank the survivors by geology, title, infrastructure and execution risk.

Verify title, access and legacy well risks

Map certainty is not title certainty. Follow the chain from fee owner to mineral owner, then through each lease, amendment, royalty obligation and surface agreement. Identify fractional interests, mortgages, liens, unpaid production charges, zoning restrictions, setbacks and pending litigation. Confirm who can sign an oil and gas lease and who must consent to a new access agreement.

Legacy wells can change both the drilling plan and the liability. Before treating a parcel as genuinely unpenetrated, use the property-map guidance to spot abandoned wells and compare their positions with proposed paths. A plugged vertical well may have depleted a nearby reservoir, while an orphan well can carry contamination, remediation or lien risk even when it sits outside the target interval.

Australian readers should keep familiar legal assumptions separate from U.S. law. In Queensland, petroleum access and Crown resources sit within the Petroleum and Gas Act 1993 and Land Act 1994, while native-title interests are considered through the Native Title Act 1993 and Indigenous Land Use Agreements. Those regimes do not govern a U.S. parcel, but they reinforce the need to document tenure, consent and stakeholder access rather than infer them from a pin on a map.

The Australian market setting also changes how an opportunity should be assessed. The east-coast gas market has long been shaped by LNG and coal seam gas in Queensland and New South Wales, alongside conventional supply from the Cooper and Eromanga basins; that is context, not a direct proxy for U.S. shale. A Queensland grazing station or mixed-farming property may look like one operating property, while a U.S. parcel can divide surface, mineral and lease interests. Australian investors should model returns in USD, convert them to AUD, obtain Australian tax advice and coordinate overnight calls with U.S. operators from Brisbane, Sydney or Perth.

Start a focused seven-day acreage review

Score the finalists rather than declaring an outright winner. Compare geology and recoverable resource, title quality, infrastructure, operator execution, contract terms and downside exposure, then record what evidence could change the ranking. The strongest candidate should have a clear drilling path, secured acreage and a plausible route to cash flow, not merely the absence of nearby horizontal wells.

Create a free seven-day Shale Navigator account, select one basin and formation, and build a ranked shortlist using the two-stage screen. Use the trial to test assumptions, save supporting map notes and identify where added data or a subscription would change a decision, then move only the best-ranked parcels into formal title, environmental and legal diligence.



Welcome to ShaleNavigator
This online map application displays information specific to the leasing and development of shale plays in the United States, with particular focus on the Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virgina, and New York's Marcellus and Utica shale leasing and drilling activity.

Data
Pipeline infrastructure, company land holdings, permit data, producing well data, and water impoundment sites provide base layers in the play, with other data layers our research team will continue to add and update regularly. Subscribers will be notified as new data are added. Our data is compiled from a variety of public and private sources for your use. We make every effort to review its quality. Contact us if you have high quality, relevant data and would like to become a data contributor.

Access ShaleNavigator
There is free registration to access ShaleNavigator's basic application and a resonably priced Subscription to access advanced data and map making, drawing, and sharing features.