Signup Sample Report


Signup for a free 7 Day account and view Marcellus, Utica, Eagle Ford, and Antrim shale map layers in Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia, Texas, and Michigan. Subscribe to view recent Lease Offers and Available Property, and additional pipeline layers. Click the Free Signup to get started, no software downloads required! (Firefox is recommended Browser)

Recent Maps


EQT Wetzel Co WV Permit Location 02-2016


Chesapeake Jefferson Co OH 12 2015 Permit.Pipeline


Gulfport Belmont Permit Location 11-24-2015


11-2015 Gulfport Belmont Co Permit


XTO Belmont Co Permit Loc w/Pipelines

Spotting Abandoned Wells on a Property Map

Abandoned oil and gas wells can affect property value, mineral-rights negotiations, environmental reviews, and future development plans. A well symbol on a map, however, rarely tells the whole story. It may represent a producing well, an inactive well, a plugged well, or a site whose records have not been updated consistently.

A careful review combines map layers with regulatory records, production history, permit information, and physical clues. Shale Navigator helps bring these data points into one property-focused view, allowing users to examine well locations alongside leases, pipelines, drilling permits, mineral rights, and parcel boundaries.

The objective is not simply to find an old well. It is to determine its current status, understand the obligations connected to it, and identify whether its location could affect a transaction, an engineering project, or land use.

Define What Abandoned Means

“Abandoned” can describe several different conditions. A well may have been permanently plugged and closed, temporarily abandoned while awaiting future work, or left inactive because production stopped. Some records use terms such as orphaned, shut-in, inactive, or nonproducing, each of which can carry different legal and operational implications.

A permanently plugged well has usually undergone a formal closure process, including removal of equipment and sealing of the wellbore according to state requirements. An orphaned well may have no financially responsible operator, creating potential concerns about remediation or state-led plugging. An inactive well, by contrast, may still have an identifiable operator and may be eligible for reactivation.

Property-map research should therefore treat “abandoned” as a status to verify rather than a conclusion drawn from age alone. A well drilled decades ago may still be active, while a newer well may already be shut in or awaiting regulatory action.

Read Map Layers And Well Symbols

Begin by locating the parcel boundary, then activate the well, production, permit, lease, and pipeline layers. Look for wells positioned directly on the property, near boundary lines, or within shared drilling units. A nearby well may still affect mineral development, access roads, setbacks, or underground formations beneath the parcel.

Map symbols and colors can reveal broad status categories, but their meaning depends on the source and update date. Review the legend and examine the well record attached to each point. Important fields may include the API number, operator, well name, completion date, last production date, well type, depth, and plugging status.

Pay special attention to duplicate points or multiple records at nearly the same coordinates. A single surface location can represent several wellbores, sidetracks, or recompletions. Comparing API identifiers helps distinguish a genuinely abandoned well from an active well with an older associated record.

Compare Permits, Production, And Site Evidence

An old well should be compared with nearby permits and drilling activity. A recent workover, recompletion, injection permit, or transfer of ownership may indicate that the operator intends to keep the well in service. Conversely, a long gap in production combined with an expired permit and no current operator activity strengthens the case that the well is inactive or abandoned.

For a practical explanation of how permit records relate to future development, review this drilling permit map guide. Permit information does not automatically establish a well’s final status, but it can reveal whether the surrounding area remains operationally active.

Satellite imagery and site visits add another layer of evidence. A cleared pad, access track, tank battery, pump jack, vent, or fenced wellhead may show that a site remains in use. Vegetation growth and deteriorated equipment may suggest inactivity, yet visual evidence cannot replace official plugging records. Never enter a well site without permission, and treat equipment or exposed materials as potential safety hazards.

Distinguish Inactive Wells From Abandoned Wells

The most important distinction is between a well that has stopped producing and one that has been formally closed. Production data may show no recent volumes, but the operator could retain the right to reactivate the well. A plugging report, regulatory closure record, or status code is stronger evidence of permanent abandonment.

Use several indicators together rather than relying on a single map color. The comparison below provides a starting framework for interpreting common records and map signals.

Map or Record Signal Likely Meaning What To Verify
Recent production volumes The well is probably active Current operator, latest reporting date, production type
No production for an extended period Inactive, shut-in, or nonproducing Inactivity rules, permits, operator status
Plugging date or completion report Formal closure may have occurred Plugging method, regulatory approval, surface restoration
Orphaned or abandoned designation No active responsible party may be recorded State program, remediation status, bonding information
Old well symbol with no detail Incomplete or outdated mapping is possible API number, agency database, coordinate accuracy
Nearby workover or recompletion permit The well may be returning to service Permit expiration, inspection records, operator filings

A status discrepancy is itself useful information. If the map says “plugged” but a production database shows recent output, or if a regulatory record lists an operator that differs from a lease document, flag the conflict for further review. Data may be updated on different schedules, and a well can change hands without every connected source changing at the same time.

Validate Findings With Records And Context

State oil and gas agencies are usually the primary source for well status, plugging reports, mechanical integrity records, and operator information. Search by API number whenever possible, because well names and surface addresses can vary between databases. Save the document date and source URL so the status can be traced later.

Ownership and lease records provide additional context. A mineral-rights owner may have obligations that differ from the surface owner, while an old lease may include provisions about access, plugging, restoration, or future operations. Pipeline and gathering-system layers can also indicate whether a supposedly inactive area remains connected to production infrastructure.

Be cautious with unrelated online material during a property investigation. For example, a casino information page is not evidence of well status, ownership, or regulatory compliance and should never be treated as a source for due diligence. Keep the review focused on official records, traceable datasets, and documents tied to the specific property.

Build A Property Review Workflow

A repeatable process reduces missed wells and makes findings easier to explain to clients, attorneys, investors, or regulators. Start with a broad map review, then move to individual well records and finally to supporting documents. Record uncertainty instead of forcing every well into an active or abandoned category.

For each property, create a short evidence file containing the map view, parcel identifier, well API numbers, status records, production history, permit details, and notes about visible site conditions. The following steps provide a practical sequence:

  • Confirm the parcel boundary and search for wells inside, adjacent to, or near access corridors.
  • Record each well’s API number, coordinates, operator, well name, and mapped status.
  • Compare production history with permits, plugging reports, and recent regulatory filings.
  • Check leases, mineral-rights records, pipelines, and access agreements for related obligations.
  • Mark uncertain wells for professional verification rather than labeling them abandoned prematurely.

This workflow is especially valuable when several wells overlap a unit or when a property has changed ownership multiple times. It also creates a defensible record for negotiations and helps identify which questions should be directed to a landman, environmental consultant, attorney, or state agency.

Use Map Findings In Property Decisions

An abandoned or potentially abandoned well can influence more than the appearance of a property map. It may affect construction setbacks, drainage plans, crop operations, environmental assessments, insurance decisions, and the marketability of mineral rights. Surface restoration may be incomplete even when a well is listed as plugged, and access rights may survive after production ends.

Shale Navigator can help users move from a broad regional view to a parcel-level investigation by combining well locations with property and development data. A free seven-day account offers an opportunity to examine the relevant layers and determine which subscription features are useful for deeper research.

Use the map as the starting point, verify every important status through authoritative records, and preserve the evidence behind each finding. Open Shale Navigator, locate the property, and begin building a documented well-status review before making a purchase, lease, development, or land-use decision.



Welcome to ShaleNavigator
This online map application displays information specific to the leasing and development of shale plays in the United States, with particular focus on the Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virgina, and New York's Marcellus and Utica shale leasing and drilling activity.

Data
Pipeline infrastructure, company land holdings, permit data, producing well data, and water impoundment sites provide base layers in the play, with other data layers our research team will continue to add and update regularly. Subscribers will be notified as new data are added. Our data is compiled from a variety of public and private sources for your use. We make every effort to review its quality. Contact us if you have high quality, relevant data and would like to become a data contributor.

Access ShaleNavigator
There is free registration to access ShaleNavigator's basic application and a resonably priced Subscription to access advanced data and map making, drawing, and sharing features.